Search
Subscribe

Bookmark and Share

Twitter Feed
About this Blog

ENGLISH
FRANÇAIS
CHINESE 中国

English

As supply chains become globalized, they are flattening ... and fragmenting. They continue to inefficiently share information "one-up/one-down". Profound "bullwhip effects" in the chains cause managers to scramble with inventory shortages and product recalls. There are hopeful signs of change. One of those is the increasing usage of personal mobile devices by managers and consumers seeking real-time enterprise information about materials and ingredient sources. Another is the push by the major search engines, (Google, Bing, Apple, etc.) for navigational "one answer" search using semantic technologies. Another may be found in the emerging (and converging) standards for interoperabile information exchange at the level of key data elements. But enterprise data is a proprietary asset that must be selectively shared to be efficiently shared. That's really a final missing piece of the puzzle to be solved for flattening the "bullwhip effect". To overcome the fear factors that keep most enterprise data locked up in data silos, the globally patented Common Point Authoring™ (CPA) system critically provides selective sharing which incorporates fixed data elements at a single location with meta-data authorizations.

Français

Comme les chaînes d'approvisionnement sont mondialisées, ils sont aplatissement ... et la fragmentation. Ils continuent à partager des informations inefficace "one-up/one-down". Profonds effets "coup de fouet" dans les chaînes de causer des gestionnaires à brouiller avec les ruptures de stock et les rappels de produits. Il ya des signes encourageants de changement. Parmi celles-ci l'utilisation croissante des appareils mobiles personnels par les gestionnaires et les consommateurs cherchent de l'information d'entreprise en temps réel sur les matériaux et les sources d'ingrédients. Une autre est la campagne menée par les principaux moteurs de recherche (Google, Bing, Apple, etc) pour la navigation "une réponse" recherche en utilisant les technologies sémantiques. Un autre peut être trouvée dans les pays émergents (et convergentes) des normes pour l'échange d'informations interoperabile au niveau des éléments de données clés. Mais les données d'entreprise est un actif exclusif qui doit être partagé de manière sélective pour être efficacement partagée. C'est vraiment une dernière pièce manquante du puzzle à résoudre pour aplatir le "coup de fouet". Pour surmonter les facteurs qui maintiennent la peur d'entreprise données les plus enfermés dans des silos de données, le monde brevetée Authoring commune Point ™ (CPA) fournit critique partage sélectif qui intègre fixés les éléments de données à un seul endroit avec des méta-données des autorisations.

Chinese 中国

随着供应链变得全球化,他们被压扁...和碎片。他们继续,效率低下分享信息“one-up/one-down”。深刻的链的“牛鞭效应”,导致库存短缺和产品召回管理人员的争夺。有希望改变的迹象。其中之一是寻求企业级实时信息有关的材料和配料的来源由经营者和消费者的个人移动终端设备越来越多的应用。另一种是用于导航的“答案”搜索使用语义技术的推动下各大搜索引擎(谷歌,Bing,苹果等)。另一种可能是在新兴interoperabile信息交流和融合标准水平的关键数据元素。但是,企业的数据是一个专有的资产,必须有选择地共享,以有效地共享。这是真正缺少的最后一块拼图,来解决“牛鞭效应”的扁平化。为了克服恐惧的因素,让大多数企业的数据锁定在数据孤岛,在全球获得专利的共点的创作™(CPA)系统严格规定的选择性共享,其中包括固定数据元素在一个单一的位置元数据授权。

About Steve Holcombe

Unless otherwise noted, all content on this company blog site is authored by Steve Holcombe as President & CEO of Pardalis, Inc. More profile information: View Steve Holcombe's profile on LinkedIn

Follow @WholeChainCom™ at each of its online locations:

Entries in privacy (1)

Sunday
Dec092012

Membership policy announcement for the DOITCloud networking group

I initiated the Data Ownership in the Cloud™ (DOITCloud™) LinkedIn networking group in April 2009. Since that time it has grown to about 1,000 members. There have been some fantastic discussions, especially early on in 2009 and 2010. The membership has continued to grow since then but the long-threaded, multi-party discussions (see, e.g., Top Twelve Discussions: DOITCloud) have essentially ceased. Other comparatively similar forums have popped up in LinkedIn or elsewhere to provide a place for people to voice similar opinions and concerns. That's a good thing.

I come from a legal background with marketplace experiences regarding the sharing of "enterprise data" in fragmented supply chains. The Data Ownership in the Cloud group was generally begun by me to (a) learn more about the "personal data" space, and (b) find "birds of a feather". Both "data ownership" and "the Cloud" are amorphous terms by themselves. Even more so when stitched together. But I suspect that each DOITCloud member has at least a visceral feeling that the internet should be providing more choices to people and their "personal data". Or something like that. In any case, many of DOITCloud have become directly connected to me on LinkedIn. Thanks! I am so glad our paths crossed.

Again, the long-threaded discussions have ended though I almost every day post a discussion (almost always a link to blog posts or articles). I'm not posting those discussions with much of an expectation that a multi-party discussion will be sparked. I am using the group now mostly as a resource for cataloging relevant content. And that serves an important purpose for me that I am pleased to continue sharing with you.

However, I will soon be instituting a policy of a requiring a direct LinkedIn (LI) connection to me for membership in the DOITCloud group. If you are already directly connected to me then there's nothing else to do. If you are not yet directly connected to me on LI, and desire to remain a member of DOITCloud, then please send me an LI invitation to directly connect.

The content posted to the DOITCloud group will remain the same. I would characterize the content posted here at DOITCloud as mostly applicable to "personal data". I am also posting content relevant to "enterprise data" at another LI networking group I formed earlier this year called the @WholeChainCom™ networking group.

There is much rhetorical cross-over these days between "personal data" and "enterprise data" but enterprise data is - and in my opinion will long remain - different from personal data. Enterprise data is a proprietary asset that must be selectively shared to be efficiently shared. Greater trust and provenance in supply chains requires fixing (i.e., immutablizing) data elements at single locations with meta-data authorizations. (Want to know more?). So for the foreseeable future it makes sense that DOITCloud™ (addressing the sharing of personal data) and @WholeChainCom™ (addressing the sharing of enterprise data), remain separate "sister" groups.

I'll begin instituting the new membership policy on the 15th of December, 2012. If you do decide to not continue your DOITCloud membership I want to say this:

"Thank you for your time spent in the DOITCloud group. It's been fun. It's been informative. It's been relevant. I hope that we connect again later on down the road. Safe travels."

If you have any questions, comments or anything else on your mind that you think I should read, please post them here. Thanks, again.